More and more, our cities welcome people from different countries. With different tastes there are traditions and ways of life. It is the great challenge of our years. How to act in the face of this challenge? Does it bring with it only problems, as we hear from so many parts, or even opportunities? The best way to listen from the immigration lawyer london
The Intercultural Dialogues
Since 2008, the year of intercultural dialogue, a network of cities has formed in Europe that see diversity as a resource, as an advantage for intellectual and economic development, rather than as a problem. The idea is that diversity can foster innovation and creativity, and therefore the competitive position and quality of life in cities. The key is that adequate institutions and policies establish the conditions for groups and people to be able to interact freely (in the neighborhood, at work, in school) beyond cultural differences. The commitment is to build bridges that unite us, instead of strengthening the identity gates that separate us.
The network of intercultural cities (initially supported by the European Commission and the Council of Europe) started in 2008 with 9 cities: Berlin Neukölln (Germany), Izhevsk (Russia), Lublin (Poland), Lyon (France), Melitopol (Ukraine ), Neuchâtel (Switzerland), Patras (Greece), and Subotica (Serbia), and for Italy, Reggio Emilia. The network has grown over time. Today there are over 80 cities, including 21 Italian cities. Initially limited to Europe, the initiative is expanding to Korea, Mexico and Canada. The cities are mainly medium-small, but there are also large cities, from London (some districts) to Barcelona, Oslo and Copenhagen.
- The participating cities undertake to adopt a strategy for inter-culturality that is based on the recognition of the positive value of diversity. The strategy must embrace various areas: from school policy to the management of urban spaces, to reception policies, to cultural mediation and to relations with the media. In return, they have access to two great opportunities. On the one hand, they can learn from other cities, based on their experiences and practices. A collection of 300 good practices can be consulted online. On the other hand, they are evaluated and compared through an “inter-culturality index”. In this way, they can measure their progress over time and compare to other cities.
The index has been compiled by 50 cities for now. Although it is too early to draw conclusions, the first analysis shows that in cities with higher index values, citizens have a better perception of their safety.
The intercultural cities met in Dublin on 5-8 February 2013. In the end, the participants (over 250, representing local administrations, academics, international institutions) signed a common charter, recognizing the positive value of the experience of intercultural cities and committing to collaborate with other cities and institutions to reaffirm diversity as a positive value.
The Question from Dan
“What made immigration such an emotional issue, especially among the Republicans?” Asks Dan McLaughlin on the National Review, “for what reasons did the ‘caravan’ news dominate the eve of the midterm elections? Why should we see the crossings? Of migrants on the border as” a national emergency”, or shut down because of the wall? It’s not just Donald Trump’s fault, his political rise was both the result and the cause of the increasing intensity of the migration issue. The finger against racism or xenophobia is not an adequate explanation, it does not identify the reasons why the current situation is different from that of ten or twenty years ago. To understand the reasons for the change, we must understand the deeper causes of the problem.